Jump to content

X E N O N

Inactive Member
  • Posts

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

About X E N O N

Informations

  • Country
    Italy
  • Nationality
    Italian

Recent Profile Visitors

1006 profile views

X E N O N's Achievements

Enthusiast

Enthusiast (6/16)

  • One Year In
  • Collaborator Rare
  • One Month Later
  • Reacting Well
  • Week One Done

Recent Badges

13

Reputation

  1. The link is valid, simply for extraordinary reasons it is the download site that is offline.
  2. I haven't tried it, but according to the logic of the system it should have malfunctions roughly related to the positions (indexes) of the items for sale. For example, if a bracelet and a necklace are generated, and both are selected for sale, and then these two items are replaced by other items (any as long as they have a sell flag) in the same positions (inventory indices), the new items would be sold instead of the selected ones. There should be no price issues in the sense that the check is performed only once the item is sold. This BUG has been fixed on the official files by applying an interface binding when selecting the sale via NPC. The idea of the system is nice and clean as an interface. I like it! I will probably use it
  3. Privacy-related issues are always sensitive, as they should be. The only flaw, perhaps, might be that it was not made 100% clear when presenting the matter in a preventive manner. I suppose if everything had been brought to light initially, none of this would have happened. Regarding the fact that customers do not complain, it must be clearly stated that 99.9% of customers who turn to a development service do not have the skills to evaluate certain contexts and/or discover them. Most of them are young people who dream of opening a P.Server of Metin2, and at least 50% of those who turn to a development service probably will never actually see their project completed and presented to the public. All this is to say that those who did not complain about this data processing approach - whatever the reason - are mostly unaware of what really happens behind the dark meanders of the FileServer. This, of course, is not an attack on OWSAP's personality nor a stance in favor or against them, but merely an observation based on what has been said so far. Personally, if I found myself in the position of being a customer of this individual, I would certainly present doubts and/or complaints at first, but at the same time, I would feel confident in the developer based on the relationship established during my experience. Judge, everything here is relative. Can OWSAP be trusted, or not? Are we really convinced that all this can be harmful to customers, or can we deduce that these are indeed precautions taken by the developer to offer better support and a better experience for the customers? If all this had been done by more authoritative users, without naming names as it would not be appropriate, would we still be here commenting on all this, embodying doubts about the veracity of the intentions? The floor is yours.
  4. I'm not here to argue for one or the other, I simply believe that if you put your customers in front of a choice, and you are transparent in proposing your constraints, and the customers accept well... Then there is little to discuss. As long as what we see in this thread is clear as day for OWSAP customers themselves, I don't see why it shouldn't be fine for those who are not its customers. I'm not arguing for one or the other as I already said, but I think we should all be more objective in judging. That applying a license to a source code from 2024 if we are talking about Metin2 especially, is completely useless as it can be By-passed in less than half an hour, that's another matter.
  5. Great job, very clean and doesn't take away from what "Metin2" is supposed to be. Congratulations, I'll probably use it.
  6. This kind of content (and above all the commitment and spirit of sharing) are always appreciated in the development communities. The idea of making the project Open-Source, can have multiple advantages. Every kind of user can approach this tool even as a simple in-depth study on Python studies. Instead, from expert users we can expect advice/ideas to improve it further. Thank you!
  7. Thank you for this important sharing.
  8. Thank you for your availability, unfortunately the prices seem relatively high for what my use will be.
  9. Sorry for my ignorance. I don't understand much about anything related to web scripts and forums in general. Can I ask you how to use this Release Notes page? It would be very important for me to be able to use it. Currently, if it can be useful, I have an active hosting service.
  10. I love these cute things! And then with a little customization they go with everything.
  11. What a cute idea
  12. I noticed that to read the BOSS in the maps, they must be marked as "m" (mob) and not as "g" (group) in the regen files (currently boss.txt is the first one I tried) In any case the System works, with the author's permission I would like to extend it and apply different features, it gave me some ideas in mind!
  13. It works perfectly, no errors. Video
  14. Great contribution! Personally I consider the public system quite deprecated and unnecessarily burdensome. Some things were handled too "broadly" ... and I love the gift of synthesis.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy / Guidelines / We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.