Jump to content

FreeBSD

Banned
  • Posts

    12
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by FreeBSD

  1. i see. any idea why it would be so and where should i look? is it a datatype mismatch or something? i am willing to pay for fix update: i dont know what was the problem, but i used a recent backup of my source and everything worked again.
  2. hello can someone help me this core is generated inside auth.. (gdb) core game.core [New LWP 100174] [New LWP 100230] [New LWP 100231] [New LWP 100232] warning: Could not load shared library symbols for [vdso]. Do you need "set solib-search-path" or "set sysroot"? Core was generated by `./auth'. Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. Address not mapped to object. #0 DESC::Packet (this=this@entry=0x0, c_pvData=c_pvData@entry=0x8212c4a93, iSize=iSize@entry=261) at desc.cpp:428 428 if (m_iPhase == PHASE_CLOSE) // ▒▒▒ ▒▒▒¸▒ ▒▒▒▒▒▒ ▒ʴ´▒. [Current thread is 1 (LWP 100174)] (gdb) bt full #0 DESC::Packet (this=this@entry=0x0, c_pvData=c_pvData@entry=0x8212c4a93, iSize=iSize@entry=261) at desc.cpp:428 No locals. #1 0x000000000035d7c9 in DESC::SendKeyAgreement (this=0x0) at desc.cpp:736 packet = {static MAX_DATA_LEN = 256, bHeader = 251 '\373', wAgreedLength = 19440, wDataLength = 46496, data = "\377\377\377\377\377\377\377\037\020\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\350\3172\b", '\000' <repeats 11 times>, "\240\265J\000\000\000\000\000pK,!\b\000\000\000\377\377\377\377\377\377\377\037\020\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\200\347\3172\b\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\377\377\377\377صJ\000\000\000\000\000\2505\0334K\016\311\302\303G@\30040\234\234H\001\3172\b\000\000\000\377\377\377\377\377\377\377\377\020\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\360J,!\b\000\000\000x\202F\251Q[@\315\17750\371d\321 \277\252\266\233\377\305\316O\246b\025\271\226e\342\343\277P\001\225!\b\000\000\000\377\377\377\377\377\377\377\377 \000\000\000\000\000\000\000 K,!\b\000\000\000@"...} data_length = <optimized out> agreed_length = <optimized out> #2 0x0000000000440b8f in Cipher::Prepare (this=0x8212c4c08, buffer=0x828a09c70 <__stack_chk_guard>, length=0x8212c4c18) at cipher.cpp:156 agreed_length = <optimized out> #3 0x000000000035d794 in DESC::SendKeyAgreement (this=0x832de2600) at desc.cpp:724 --Type <RET> for more, q to quit, c to continue without paging-- packet = {static MAX_DATA_LEN = 256, bHeader = 50 '2', wAgreedLength = 8, wDataLength = 0, data = "\001\000\000\000\031\t\\\340\2248kIU\301\riN\000\000\000\000\000\000\000p\234\240(\b\000\000\000Գ\000\000\000\000\000\000\300L,!\b\000\000\000p\234\240(\b\000\000\000\220L,!\b\000\000\000\215\002\225(\b\000\000\000\377\005\246d\000\000\000\000\030\366/I(m\324\t\2248kIU\301\ri\300L,!\b", '\000' <repeats 19 times>, "\260L,!\b\000\000\000\377\005\246d\000\000\000\000 \000\000\0000\000\000\000\340L,!\b\000\000\000\340K,!\b\000\000\000\000&\3362\b\000\000\000ֳ", '\000' <repeats 14 times>, "0M,!\b\000\000\000s\3265\000\000\000\000\000\2248"...} data_length = 256 agreed_length = <optimized out> #4 0x00000000003884bd in CInputProcessor::Handshake (d=0x832de2600, c_pData=0x837722e40 "\377\204x+\277Գ", this=<optimized out>) at input.cpp:211 p = 0x837722e40 #5 CInputHandshake::Analyze (this=<optimized out>, d=0x832de2600, bHeader=<optimized out>, c_pData=0x837722e40 "\377\204x+\277Գ") at input.cpp:306 No locals. #6 0x0000000000387ca6 in CInputProcessor::Process (this=0x832de2658, lpDesc=0x832de2600, c_pvOrig=<optimized out>, iBytes=<optimized out>, r_iBytesProceed=@0x8212c51ec: 0) at input.cpp:107 --Type <RET> for more, q to quit, c to continue without paging-- iExtraPacketSize = <optimized out> bHeader = 255 '\377' c_pszName = 0x8376d6ef9 "Handshake" c_pData = 0x837722e40 "\377\204x+\277Գ" bLastHeader = <optimized out> iLastPacketLen = 0 iPacketLen = <optimized out> #7 0x000000000035cffc in DESC::ProcessInput (this=0x832de2600) at desc.cpp:306 iBytesProceed = 0 bytes_read = 13 #8 0x000000000047f417 in io_loop (fdw=0x832c30340) at main.cpp:916 iRet = 1231763604 num_events = 2 event_idx = 1 d = 0x832de2600 #9 0x000000000047f0fd in idle () at main.cpp:805 pta = {tv_sec = 1688602111, tv_usec = 1709} process_time_count = 0 now = {tv_sec = 1688602111, tv_usec = 1681} passed_pulses = <optimized out> t = 46038 #10 0x000000000047e165 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at main.cpp:487 --Type <RET> for more, q to quit, c to continue without paging-- sectree_manager = {<singleton<SECTREE_MANAGER>> = { _vptr$singleton = 0x256f70 <vtable for SECTREE_MANAGER+16>, static ms_singleton = 0x8212c5eb8}, static current_sectree_version = 768, m_map_pkSectree = {__tree_ = { __begin_node_ = 0x8212c5ec8, __pair1_ = {<std::__1::__compressed_pair_elem<std::__1::__tree_end_node<std::__1::__tree_node_base<void*>*>, 0, false>> = {__value_ = { __left_ = 0x0}}, <std::__1::__compressed_pair_elem<std::__1::allocator<std::__1::__tree_node<std::__1::__value_type<unsigned int, SECTREE_MAP*>, void*> >, 1, true>> = {<std::__1::allocator<std::__1::__tree_node<std::__1::__value_type<unsigned int, SECTREE_MAP*>, void*> >> = {<std::__1::__non_trivial_if<true, std::__1::allocator<std::__1::__tree_node<std::__1::__value_type<unsigned int, SECTREE_MAP*>, void*> > >> = {<No data fields>}, <No data fields>}, <No data fields>}, <No data fields>}, __pair3_ = {<std::__1::__compressed_pair_elem<unsigned long, 0, false>> = { __value_ = 0}, <std::__1::__compressed_pair_elem<std::__1::__map_value_compare<unsigned int, std::__1::__value_type<unsigned int, SECTREE_MAP*>, std::__1::less<unsigned int>, true>, 1, true>> = {<std::__1::__map_value_compare<unsigned int, std::__1::__value_type<unsigned int, SECTREE_MAP*>, std::__1::less<unsigned int>, true>> = {<std::__1::less<unsigned int>> = {<std::__1::binary_function<unsigned int, unsigned int, bool>> = {<No data fields>}, <No data fields>}, <No data fields>}, <No data fields>}, <No data fields>}}}, m_map_pkArea = {
  3. Hello everyone, after a long break from metin im trying to get involved again. Happy to meet all of you and be a part of this community.
  4. in the C/C++ compiler option in Makefile, what's really the difference between specifying clang++, or clang++-devel as the compiler? Aren't they the same thing (both are C++ compilers)? Also, side question, when compiling thelibcore, which is strictly a C program, doesn't it make more sense to use clang or clang-devel as the compiler, not clang++, not clang++-devel? And why is it when i try to do that, it raises syntax errors like missing brackets?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy / Guidelines / We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.