Jump to content

TheLionIK

Inactive Member
  • Posts

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Posts posted by TheLionIK

  1. Regarding sendmail, as the same implies, its a service to send emails.

    https://metin2.download/picture/VLNNALbhG0Y3WJwo8CRdEEyIhO25GpRK/.png

    The fact that people have to "disable" it, its because they are not manually installing their freebsd, and instead they are relying on the auto-installers from providers.

    Thats most likely the reason why you are also having 700mb ram usage on your freebsd.

     

    This is freebsd13 manually installed, with the "settings" above.

    https://metin2.download/picture/n8ErRh0MoaDMx65nX0jYL7prQVGze1Ki/.png

     

    Without any third-party software.

    That is why i wrote its impossible for a fresh install of freebsd to use 700mb ram, its all due to the third-party software providers install on their freebsd snapshots.

    • Love 1
  2. First, a fresh install of vanilla freebsd using 700mb ram is impossible.

    The only reason why that would happen is due to third party software.

    Most (bad, just ignore them) providers will provide you with a freebsd vps with pre-installed software. You just manually install freebsd in those cases, as you should do anyway.

    Regarding the "USB / CAMERA", you are reading topics from 2012 where people built their own kernels stripping them, for absolutely no reason whatsoever, as it has 0% performance impact in the real world. You maybe save what, 20MB disk size....? A metin2 syslog easilly takes more then that.

     

    Just install MANUALLY your freebsd without selecing services that you wont need.

    Then if you want performance increases work on your metin2 source, because thats where the crap performance comes from, not from a rock-solid OS like freebsd.

    • Love 1
  3. What the actual fuck are you talking about, seriously.

    "without useless codes active"

    Seriously, what the hell you talking about?

    This is not windows thats comes with solitaire or pinball (xp you will be missed), you are talking about the bsd family that just destroys any junkix (junk + linux got it or...?) distro.

    Seriously, i can start a 512mb ram and put online a metin2 server with 1ch, so what do you wanna clean here?

    Oh wait, you think that deleting man pages for examples makes your system faster?

    Its completly non-sense that its hard for me to realize if you are talking seriously or trolling, but both cases are troubling.

    • Lmao 1
  4. 24 minutes ago, Draveniou1 said:

    Today creating new version for key

     

    1) open in packet.h  serverside/clientside packet.h

    search:

    command_login2

    command_login3

    command_login5

     

    add:

    #ifdef PROTECTION_PACKET
        int    bloPakediMiet[8];
        long    bloPwerdiMiet[9];
        int    bloPtwejiMiet[8];
        long    bloPgssdfiMiet[9];
        int    bloPghcvMiet[8];
        long    bloPghdsdiMiet[9];
        int    bloPaiopryiMiet[8];
    #endif

     

    open service.h / locale_inc.h

    add

    #ifdef PROTECTION_PACKET

     

     

     

    After 20-30 days 

    change name from code

        int    bloPakediMiet[8];
        long    bloPwerdiMiet[9];
        int    bloPtwejiMiet[8];
        long    bloPgssdfiMiet[9];
        int    bloPghcvMiet[8];
        long    bloPghdsdiMiet[9];
        int    bloPaiopryiMiet[8];

     

    example:

        int    wertgwertgetgrgergrgyergh[8];
        long    fghfghfgjfgjhfgjhdfhdhd[9];
        int    AWERWQRWQEREFRSF[8];
        long    gsdfsfwetwerwertfwetfwefwefgUiet[9];
        int    WETWETWERTFWEFTWEFTWEFGWE[8];
        long    SDFWETGERTGWETFWERFWRFWQRQWRQWRt[9];
        int    WETFWEWETFGWETGWETGWEGWGWETGTG[8];
     

     

    after 20 days again rename BYTES

     

        int    wertgwertgetdfgsdfgsdgdsfggrgergrgyergh[8];
        long    fghfghfgjfgsdfsdfsdfgjhfgjhdfhdhd[9];
        int    AWERWQRWsdfgsdgfsdgsdQEREFRSF[8];
        long    gsdfsfwetwersdgsdfgsdgwertfwetfwefwefgUiet[9];
        int    WETWETWdfgdfgdfgfghERTFWEFTWEFTWEFGWE[8];
        long    SDFWETGfhdfhdfghERTGWETFWERFWRFWQRQWRQWRt[9];
        int    WETFWEWEfgsdsdhgsdsdghsdghsdTFGWETGWETGWEGWGWETGTG[8];

     

     

     

    Im sorry but... whats exactly the new version here really?

    No new packing, no new encryption, hell, not even adding a placebo argument.

    Since when changing variable names at the source code impacts anything when you leave the functions exactly as they are?

    One can easilly identify it, it just a non-sense waste of time im my opinion.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy / Guidelines / We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.